Undergraduate paramedic student competency assessment: A grounded theory study explaining how assessors in Australia and New Zealand determine student competency to practice | UniSC | University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia

Accessibility links

Non-production environment - edittest.usc.edu.au

Undergraduate paramedic student competency assessment: A grounded theory study explaining how assessors in Australia and New Zealand determine student competency to practice

Paramedics play a critical role in the healthcare system, often being the first responders in life-threatening situations. With the evolving landscape of paramedic education, transitioning from vocational training to academic programs, the assessment of paramedic student competence has become a concern. In a recent study published in the Journal of Paramedic Practice, researchers Anthony Clement Smith, Patrea Andersen, and Michael Carey shed light on how paramedic assessors in academia and ambulance services determine the professional competence of undergraduate paramedic students in Australia and New Zealand.

Many countries, including Australia and New Zealand, have shifted towards academic programs. This transition has led to a lack of standardised curricula and assessment frameworks, resulting in a wide variation in competency assessment processes. Consequently, concerns have arisen about the readiness and competence of paramedic graduates to meet the demands of their profession. To address these concerns, the researchers used Glaserian Grounded Theory (GGT) as their methodology, which is designed to describe experiences or problems and provide an in-depth understanding of what is happening in a particular area of interest. The research offers valuable insights and highlights the critical categories of engaging, measuring, and moderating, which collectively form the Paramedic Assessment Process (PAP). Understanding PAP is crucial in ensuring that paramedic students are adequately prepared to provide high-quality care in emergency situations. As the field of paramedicine continues to evolve, these research findings help to improve the consistency and rigor of paramedic education and assessment and the importance of aligning assessment practices to enhance the competence and readiness of future paramedic professionals. Ultimately, this study contributes to the ongoing improvement of paramedic education and, consequently, the quality of care provided to those in need during critical times.

Anthony Clement Smith, Patrea Andersen, and Dr Michael Carey